Does atheism require more faith than theism given its following two beliefs: 1. that an exquisitely finely tuned universe arose from nothing and 2. that a self-replicating and self-regulating cell arose via an unguided process from non-life?

 Does atheism require more faith than theism given its following two beliefs: 1. that an exquisitely finely tuned universe arose from nothing and 2. that a self-replicating and self-regulating cell arose via an unguided process from non-life?

The idea that atheism requires more faith than theism is a common argument put forward by some theists, but it's important to analyze it carefully and consider alternative perspectives.

Firstly, let's break down the two "beliefs" you mentioned:

1. Therefore, comparing the "faith" involved in atheism and theism is not simply apples to apples. Faith in theism involves accepting the existence of something extraordinary without direct evidence, while accepting the propositions you mentioned in the context of atheism often stems from scientific inquiry and the willingness to embrace open questions and potentially counterintuitive explanations.

Ultimately, the question of whether atheism requires more faith than theism is a subjective one, depending on individual interpretations and definitions of "faith." It's important to avoid oversimplification and consider the nuances of each position, recognizing that both involve different kinds of reasoning and acceptance of uncertainty.

If you'd like to delve deeper into the specific scientific hypotheses or philosophical arguments surrounding the universe's origin or abiogenesis, I'd be happy to provide further information and discuss various perspectives!